Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JasonT's avatar

Well, not being a significant consumer of social media, I had avoided this controversy until just now. I will probably continue to steer clear but at least I won't be surprised if it comes up in casual conversation one day.

You make the good point that we are admonished to speak with grace and allow the Spirit to produce the effect needed. However, it seems the message may be more damaging than the language. Paul's vulgarity was directed at "another gospel" rather than bad language. Perhaps for another post.

Blessings

Expand full comment
Jon Cutchins's avatar

I guess that I don't frequent the right places to be much aware of this controversy. My general feelings are that when people need offending, rubbing their noses in death/resurrection and the forgiveness of those we deem unworthy is worth an awful lot of sexual references.

That being said, I think that the church has been poorly served by confusing politeness with holiness. We need a great deal more plain speaking than we have been getting/doing, and that doesn't seem to be taught in seminaries but in places almost as disreputable. I think that it was Mere Christianity where Lewis put his rather useful contrast between chastity and modesty. I think that that is very much how I feel on the subject. But plain speaking is only useful if the words plainly spoken are full of grace and truth.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts